Dear Shuvro
I feel it is my responsibility ( being the first secretary general of BTN and still a member of the executive committee) to respond to this motivational and ill-perceived memo circulated among the ICT4D practitioners across the world.
The memo is full of mix of truth and lie, with distorted the reality, and it shows that you wrote this piece with inadequate research and probe.
Let me go one by one:
> BTN was started during the last military backed government. They made a controversial man its chairman, later he was replaced.
>
You did totally ignore the process of birth of BTN.
The process of formation of BTN started in 2005, after the WSIS held in Tunis. A number of organisations involved in ICT4D decided to form BTN to foster the movement of building an inclusive information and knowledge system. The idea was to leverage the strength of organisations and accelerate telecentre movement. BNNRC, Practical Action, Drik, YPSA, Ekota FairTrade Forum and D.Net started telecentre times in Bangla to share the happenings on the ICT4D front to the stakeholders and they started publishing it with money from their own pockets.
Then, in August 2006 a two day international workshop was held in Rangpur, which was organised by BNNRC, YPSA and D.Net to initiate the process of formation of a platform of ICT4D practitioners in Bangladesh. UNDP, Bangladesh supported this programme and D.Net met the remaining cost form its own pocket. After that event, the stakeholders agreed to form a platform. As a follow-up to this event on January 13, 2010 at BRAC Centre convening meeting of BTN was held, hosted by bracNet. The date for convening meeting was fixed before the 1/11 took place. There was no specific interest of the then government to promote BTN. Rather, I faced a tough time to explain what is BTN is to the then BTRC and other parties.
The formation of BTN was no way linked with "Military Backed Government". I am wondering what is the reason for this "utter lie".
We are not aware of any controversy surrounding the first chairperson. Please shed some light, why and how he was "controversial" . He was elected as Chairperson unanimously. The first AGM of BTN re-elected him. Later he resigned from the position of Chairperson, he as not "replaced". This is another false statement you made in your memo.
> By 2011 they promised to make 40,000 telecentres across the country. So now, 1 year before 2011, they are supposed to set up about 30,000 telecentres.
>
Firstly, BTN never promised to establish 40,000 telecentres. Because, BTN is not an implementing agency, rather it is an umbrella institution, which was born to facilitate members and others in establishing telecentres. It was the aspiration of BTN members that by the 40th anniversary of Bangladesh's independence, the members want to have such number of telecentres. GrameenPhone representative Mr. Yahya announced at the convening that GP alone will establish 30,000 telecentres. During the BTN Telecentre Conference held in Bogra in November, 2008, BTN officially announced that it is not focusing anymore on numbers, the number would depend individual members' programme and government initiative. As the technology is advancing quickly, mode of access to technology and information would also change accordingly. Thus, sticking to a number would not be appropriate. BTN members played an active role in inclusion of telecentre agenda in the government programme. In the drafting of ICT Policy 2009, several members of BTN were engaged and the concept of telecnetres were mainstreamed and the new government has started establishment of telcentres aggressively and gradually telecentres will be established in all union parishad complexes. The number of telecentres would depend on need and resources allocated for this purpose. What is important is the information and knowledge system, where telecentre is an integral part.
Referring to 40,000 telecentres and trying to identify how many telecentres are there ignoring such information is not an honest attempt.
>
> But now we are not observing its any significant activity. Some members of it told me they are not interested to continue its membership because it is just blessing a few people who only want a platform. We also found a BTN pioneer was focused by attacks with some allegations. Huge spam mails were sent.
BTN is composed of its members, and the progress is dependent on the progress made by members. I should say all the members are very active in making progress towards building an inclusive information and knowledge system. When BTN was established the number of telecentre was less than 50. Now, the total number of telecentres exceeded 3000, this is an official account of BTN, so far I know. However, there are numerous spontaneous initiatives at the grassroots level and many telecentres are functioning about which BTN secretariat does not have up-to-date data at this moment. It was felt that a survey is needed.
Significant activities are going on on the ground. They are not always in the news. I would like to you request you to investigate and make the activities more visible. Probably, it is BTN's and its members' weakness that they are not good in promoting progress so far made.
It is true that BTN is going through a tough time and in the context of Bangladesh this is a natural course for any organisation. And in Bangladesh allegations are common, sometimes they are legitimate, sometimes unfounded. People with honesty of purpose do not send spam, rather they raise allegation directly to the right place and expose any wrong doing to its members and also to the public. That is needed for the organisations who work with the public fund.
A journalist like you should not make any comments on rumour, rather produce report with solid evidence. That would be benefiting to all concerned.
> I should not be proud that my assumption and analysis were right.
>
Yes, you should not be proud, because your assumption and analysis are wrong and based on lies and twisting of facts.
> I made the analysis two years back to tell ICT4D people to take right track and work in favor of people, and avoid exaggerations. Now many telecentres are stopped and suffering. It can be a nice subject in another article of mine why ICT4D are not functioning well. Why are they becoming incorporated with multinational companies, working under the corporate social responsibility programs? Why are they active in only agreement signing with some profit hungry companies?
>
The dynamics of ICT4D is complicated and there are many challenges. Everything is not rosy. There are many mistakes and wrong doing and at the same time, there are shining success stories. It is true that not always right people are at the right place. That causes deviation from an ideal course of action. But nullifying progress in the ICT4D sector is self-diminishing. One can always debate about what is going wrong, but it should be done in a manner, which does not outright nullifying progress so far made on the ground. Such attempt would demotivate thousands of grassroots champions, who gave their heart and soul for changing our society through integration of ICTs. They work not for money, they do it out of passion and for having a great dream...
BTN should not exist or should be reformed if it fails to fulfill the expectations of members and people around. But it does not mean that ICT4D is dead in Bangladesh. If BTN is not the right platform, there will be new platform which is really helping grassroots champions in making change.
I would suggest to do some hard work and find both good and bad in the ICT4D. Then you would justify yourself as a good ICT4D analyst, otherwise it is just a populism. And it is better to claim yourself "prophet".
I am open to answer any further question from you and anybody.
Thanks
Ananya Raihan
Executive Director
D.Net
and Founder Secretary General of BTN
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5097 (20100509) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset. com